The obscure town of Seadrift, nestled along the Texas Gulf Coast, is on the brink of becoming a global focal point in the quest to challenge China’s dominance in the rare earths industry. The Biden administration has granted Australian company Lynas Rare Earths a substantial sum of $258 million (AUD 404 million) to construct the sole heavy rare earths refinery outside China’s borders. This landmark initiative will facilitate the processing of material from Lynas’s Mt Weld mine in Western Australia within the United States.
Tesla’s Chairman, Robyn Denholm, in a call to action, implored government and industry to transition beyond theoretical discussions and embrace decisive action urgently. This endeavor sheds light on the intricacies and hurdles that underscore Australia’s ambitions to expand domestic critical mineral processing capabilities.
Rare earth elements, despite their relatively minuscule volumes, represent a crucial subset of critical minerals indispensable to advanced technologies such as renewable energy and defense systems. Western nations are now committed to breaking China’s stronghold over the rare earth processing industry, aiming to secure their supply chains and reduce dependency.
Notwithstanding Australia’s abundant reserves of critical minerals, including rare earths, the nation grapples with bureaucratic delays spanning multiple years for new mining ventures. This challenge is further compounded by the hesitancy of companies to explore the feasibility of enhanced processing or large-scale green manufacturing.
The recent allocation of a $1.25 billion loan by the Morrison government to Iluka Resources marked the final days of their tenure. This funding is dedicated to erecting a refinery at Eneabba in Western Australia, designed to extract rare earth oxides from tailings originating from mineral sands operations. Expected to commence operations in 2025, this refinery will also process concentrates from various other miners, including Northern Minerals.
Meanwhile, the Albanese government earmarks $500 million in loans through the Northern Australian Infrastructure Facility for critical minerals, alongside smaller investments in several critical mineral projects. Furthermore, a commitment of an additional $1 billion from the $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund has been made for value addition in the resources sector.
However, the trajectory of affordable financing and its distribution, along with the absence of new tax incentives on the governmental agenda, remains enigmatic. This is exacerbated by Australia’s inability to match the substantial governmental funding available in the United States.
Rather than relying solely on substantial governmental backing, the Australian government appears to be banking on local companies accessing subsidised US investments and markets through agreements such as the climate, critical minerals, and clean energy transformation compact inked between the two nations in May of the preceding year. However, details about the operational mechanics and acceptable levels of Chinese involvement in Australian assets remain obscure.
Though Western Australia is witnessing significant developments, including rapid shifts in lithium mining and the construction of three lithium hydroxide plants, these changes are somewhat modest in contrast to the grand vision of a resources boom in critical minerals processing and subsequent expansion of green manufacturing.
One industry executive remarked, “It’s as if we think we can click our heels three times and all of a sudden we are transported to a critical minerals future.”
Achieving this critical minerals future necessitates a robust foundation composed of reliable and affordable energy supplies, improved infrastructure, fresh workforce skills, advanced chemical processing technology, and a streamlined system for navigating complex, overlapping state and federal environmental regulations.
Despite these endeavors, challenges remain, and it is clear that addressing them will demand more than incremental improvements. In an impassioned address during Minerals Week in Canberra, Robyn Denholm, Chairman of Tesla, pressed both the government and industry to translate discussions into swift action to seize Australia’s opportunities without delay.
Denholm’s emphasis centered on the lithium-ion battery supply chain, a cornerstone of Tesla’s electric vehicles. She contended that Australia should aim for 30, rather than three, lithium hydroxide plants to secure global competitiveness. Denholm highlighted Australia’s potential to provide not only raw materials but also the essential components for battery production, emphasising the need for bold and rapid action.
Denholm noted, “If we want to unlock the future potential of our future growth, we need to expand and reshape our industrial mindset and the battery opportunity is the one to focus on to help us with this ambition.”
However, global partnerships and small upfront grants alone are insufficient. Denholm articulated the urgent need for comprehensive policy changes and incentives to drive downstream projects that mitigate operating costs throughout production cycles. She pointed to production tax credits as a proven mechanism, backed by corresponding tax rebates, which could catalyse action by both established and emerging battery material suppliers in Australia.
While these strategies have not yet gained traction in Canberra, the potential benefits are apparent. Denholm’s vision reflects the evolving landscape, highlighting that grand ambitions in critical minerals can only be realised through actionable policy changes. Complacency in this realm carries significant costs.
As the world shifts towards a sustainable future reliant on advanced technologies, the significance of seizing opportunities in critical minerals processing becomes increasingly apparent. The journey is multifaceted, marked by challenges and complexities that necessitate decisive action, innovation, and collaborative efforts across industries and governments alike.